Histone acetyltransferases derived RW20 protects and promotes rapid clearance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in zebrafish larvae / La histona acetiltransferasa derivada RW20 protege y promueve la rápida eliminación de Pseudomonas aeruginosa en larvas de pez cebra

Pseudomonas is a group of bacteria that can cause a wide range of infections, particularly in people with weakened immune systems, such as those with cystic fibrosis or who are hospitalized. It can also cause infections in the skin and soft tissue, including cellulitis, abscesses and wound infections. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPS) are the alternative strategy due to their broad spectrum of activity and act as effective treatment against multi-drug resistance pathogens. In this study, we have used an AMP, RW20 (1RPVKRKKGWPKGVKRGPPKW20). RW20 peptide is derived from the histone acetyltransferases (HATs) of the freshwater teleost, Channa striatus. The antimicrobial prediction tool has been utilized to identify the RW20 sequence from the HATs sequence. We synthesized the peptide to explore its mechanism of action. In an in vitro assay, RW20 was challenged against P. aeruginosa and we showed that RW20 displayed antibacterial properties and damaged the cell membrane. The mechanism of action of RW20 against P. aeruginosa has been established via field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) as well as fluorescence assisted cell sorter (FACS) analysis. Both these experiments established that RW20 caused bacterial membrane disruption and cell death. Moreover, the impact of RW20, in-vivo, was tested against P. aeruginosa-infected zebrafish larvae. In the infected larvae, RW20 showed protective effect against P. aeruginosa by increasing the larval antioxidant enzymes, reducing the excess oxidative stress and apoptosis. Thus, it is possible that HATs-derived RW20 can be an efficient antimicrobial molecule against P. aeruginosa.(AU)

No enhancing effects of plasmid-specific histone acetyltransferase recruitment system on transgene expression in vivo.

Altered levels of histone acetylation are associated with changes in chromosomal gene expression. Thus, the specific acetylation of histones bound to plasmid DNA might increase transgene expression. Previously, the expression of the histone acetyltransferase domain of CREB-binding protein fused to the sequence-dependent DNA binding domain of GAL4 (GAL4-HAT) successfully improved reporter gene expression in cultured cells [J. Biosci. Bioengng. 123, 277-280 (2017)]. In this study, the same approach was applied for transgene expression in mice. The activator and reporter plasmid DNAs bearing the genes for GAL4-HAT and Gaussia princeps luciferase, respectively, were co-administered into the mouse liver by hydrodynamics-based tail vein injection, and the Gaussia luciferase activity in serum was measured for two weeks. Unexpectedly, the co-injection of the GAL4-HAT and luciferase plasmid DNAs seemed to decrease, rather than increase, luciferase expression. Moreover, the co-injection apparently reduced the amount of luciferase DNA in the liver. These results indicated that this system is ineffective in vivo and suggested the exclusion of hepatic cells expressing GAL4-HAT.

A case report of pregnancy in a patient with common variable immunodeficiency emphasizing the need for personalized immunoglobulin replacement.

RATIONALE: Subcutaneous immunoglobulin administration facilitated by recombinant human hyaluronidase is a new mode of immunoglobulin replacement. It has been approved for treatment in primary and secondary antibody immunodeficiency. To date, it has not been reported in the literature as therapy of choice during pregnancy. PATIENT CONCERNS: We report a 31-year-old woman with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) followed during her first pregnancy. DIAGNOSES: The patient had a history of increased susceptibility to infections and autoimmune phenomena. From diagnosis at the age 29, she received IVIg replacement with partial response to treatment. Due to medical indications and lack of venous access, we had to search for another mode of application. The patient refused traditional, weekly conventional subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) administration. INTERVENTIONS: Immunoglobulin replacement therapy was successfully continued during pregnancy after the IV route was replaced with subcutaneous administration facilitated by recombinant human hyaluronidase. The frequency of infusions was every 3-4 weeks. OUTCOMES: The treatment was effective and well tolerated by the patient who continued it after delivery. Dosage and the schedule of infusions provided sufficient immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels for the newborn baby. LESSONS: The presented CVID case illustrates that the selection of the mode of immunoglobulin administration has to be a shared decision, which considers both patient preferences and medical needs. This approach is especially important for the pregnancy period. The case shows that the switch from IVIg to fSCIg can be a management option during pregnancy.

Facilitated Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin (fSCIg) in Autoimmune Cytopenias Associated with Common Variable Immunodeficiency.

BACKGROUND: Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is the most common symptomatic primary immune deficiency of adulthood. Besides recurrent infections, autoimmune disorders-mainly cytopenias-affect 30% of patients with CVID. OBJECTIVES: To describe the efficacy and safety of facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIg), which is a combination of 10% [human] SCIg with recombinant human hyaluronidase for the treatment of CVID-linked cytopenias. METHODS: We describe four women (mean age 54 years) with CVID associated with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) (n=3) and autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) (n=1). Diagnosis of CVID was made according to the European Society of Immune Deficiencies / Pan-American Group for Immune Deficiency criteria. All were treated with fSCIg (bi-monthly, 20 g). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 22 months, all patients achieved a stable remission from the cytopenias, characterized by increased platelet values in ITP (mean values 93000/mmc), and resolution of anemia. A reduction of the daily prednisone dose was documented in the patient with AIHA. No systemic adverse drug reactions were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data documented the efficacy and safety of fSCIg in the treatment of CVID associated with autoimmune cytopenias, with a good tolerability. We also noted the role of fSCIg as a steroid sparing agent. It is thus possible to suppose an immunomodulatory role for fSCIg, but linked to different mechanisms than IVIg, due to the peculiar pharmacokinetic and administration route of fSCIg.

Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of 2% lidocaine containing 1:200,000 epinephrine with and without hyaluronidase (75 IU) in patients with irreversible pulpitis.

INTRODUCTIONS: The purpose of this study was to determine the anesthetic efficacy of lidocaine containing epinephrine compared with lidocaine containing epinephrine plus hyaluronidase (75 IU) when performing an inferior alveolar nerve block. METHODS: Patients complaining of pain in the mandibular posterior teeth were selected. Based on their chief complaint, proper clinical and radiographic examinations were performed. Among them, 40 subjects diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis were selected. The inferior alveolar nerve block was induced using 3 mL 2% lidocaine with epinephrine. Hyaluronidase (75 IU) or a placebo was injected 30 minutes after the beginning of pulpal anesthesia (randomized and double-blind trial). The duration of the effect in the pulpal and gingival tissues was evaluated by the response to painful electrical stimuli applied to the adjacent premolar and by mechanical stimuli (pinprick) to the buccal gingiva, respectively. RESULTS: In both pulpal and gingival tissues, the duration of the anesthetic effects with hyaluronidase was longer than with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Hyaluronidase increased the duration of the effects of lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve blocks.

A randomized clinical trial of recombinant human hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous versus intravenous rehydration in mild to moderately dehydrated children in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Alternative treatment of dehydration is needed when intravenous (IV) or oral rehydration therapy fails. Subcutaneous (SC) hydration facilitated by recombinant human hyaluronidase offers an alternative treatment for dehydration. This clinical trial is the first to compare recombinant human hyaluronidase-facilitated SC (rHFSC) rehydration with standard IV rehydration for use in dehydrated children. OBJECTIVE: This Phase IV noninferiority trial evaluated whether rHFSC fluid administration can be given safely and effectively, with volumes similar to those delivered intravenously, to children who have mild to moderate dehydration. METHODS: The study included mild to moderately dehydrated children (Gorelick dehydration score) aged 1 month to 10 years. They were randomized to receive 20 mL/kg of isotonic fluids using rHFSC or IV therapy over 1 hour and then as needed until clinically rehydrated. The primary outcome was total volume of fluid administered (emergency department [ED] plus inpatient hospitalization). Secondary outcomes included mean volume infused in the ED alone, postinfusion dehydration scores and weight changes, line placement success and time, safety, and provider and parent/guardian questionnaire. RESULTS: 148 patients (mean age, 2.3 [1.91] years]; white, 53.4%; black, 31.8%) were enrolled in the intention-to-treat population (73 rHFSC; 75 IV). The primary outcome, mean total volume infused, was 365.0 (324.6) mL in the rHFSC group over 3.1 hours versus 455.8 (597.4) mL in the IV group over 6.6 hours (P = 0.51). The secondary outcome of mean volume infused in the ED alone was 334.3 (226.40) mL in the rHFSC group versus 299.6 (252.33) mL in the IV group (P = 0.03). Dehydration scores and weight changes postinfusion were similar. Successful line placement occurred in all 73 rHFSC-treated patients and 59 of 75 (78.7%) IV-treated patients (P < 0.0001). All IV failures occurred in patients aged <3 years; rHFSC rescue was successful in all patients in whom it was attempted. Both treatments were well tolerated. Clinicians rated fluid administration as easy to perform in 94.5% (69 of 73) of the rHFSC group versus 65.3% (49 of 75) of the IV group (P < 0.001). Parents/caregivers were satisfied or very satisfied with fluid administration in 94.5% (69 of 73) of rHFSC-treated patients and 73.3% (55 of 75) of IV-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: In mild to moderately dehydrated children, rHFSC was inferior to IV hydration for the primary outcome measure. However, rHFSC was noninferior in the ED phase of hydration. Additional benefits of rHFSC included time and success of line placement, ease of use, and satisfaction. SC hydration facilitated with recombinant human hyaluronidase represents a reasonable addition to the treatment options for children who have mild to moderate dehydration, especially those with difficult IV access. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00773175.

Accelerating and improving the consistency of rapid-acting analog insulin absorption and action for both subcutaneous injection and continuous subcutaneous infusion using recombinant human hyaluronidase.

Rapid-acting insulin analogs were introduced to the market in the 1990s, and these products have improved treatment of diabetes by shortening the optimum delay time between injections and meals. Compared with regular human insulin, rapid-acting insulin formulations also reduce postprandial glycemic excursions while decreasing risk of hypoglycemia. However, the current prandial products are not fast enough for optimum convenience or control. Recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) has been used to increase the dispersion and absorption of other injected drugs, and in the case of prandial insulin analogs, it confers both ultrafast absorption and action profiles. Animal toxicology studies have demonstrated excellent tolerability of rHuPH20, and human studies, involving over 60,000 injections of prandial insulin + rHuPH20 to date, have similarly shown excellent safety and tolerability. Studies using rapid-acting analog insulin with rHuPH20 have included clinic-based pharmacokinetic and glucodynamic euglycemic glucose clamp studies, test meal studies, and take-home treatment studies. Administration methods have included subcutaneous injection of coformulations of rapid-acting insulin + rHuPH20 as well as continuous subcutaneous infusion of coformulations or use of pretreatment of newly inserted infusion sets with rHuPH20 followed by standard continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy. These studies have demonstrated acceleration of insulin absorption and action along with improvement in postprandial glycemic excursions and reduction in hypoglycemia risks. Further, rHuPH20 reduces intrasubject variability of insulin absorption and action and provides greater consistency in absorption and action profiles over wear time of an infusion set. Further studies of rHuPH20 in the take-home treatment setting are underway.

Use of recombinant human hyaluronidase to accelerate rapid insulin analogue absorption: experience with subcutaneous injection and continuous infusion.

OBJECTIVE: To discuss clinical studies in which recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) was used to increase insulin dispersion and accelerate its absorption. METHODS: We reviewed 10 pertinent clinical studies, 8 of which had data available. RESULTS: In 4 euglycemic clamp studies, coinjection of rHuPH20 consistently yielded acceleration of insulin absorption, providing twice the insulin exposure during the first hour, greater and earlier peak exposure, and half the exposure beyond 2 hours after injection. Insulin-action profiles were similarly accelerated, with a 15-minute faster onset of insulin action and a 45-minute shorter duration of action for each of the 3 commercial rapid-acting insulin analogues. Infusion aspart insulin formulated with rHuPH20 also accelerated insulin absorption and action over the infusion set life when delivered by insulin pump. Administration of rHuPH20 reduced the inconsistency of insulin absorption and action profiles attributable to 3 factors-lack of reproducibility after identical injections, differences across insulin dose ranges, and changes over infusion site life. The rHuPH20-facilitated ultrafast profile consistently reduced hyperglycemic excursions both in injections immediately preceding liquid test meals and in bolus infusions immediately before solid test meals. rHuPH20-facilitated insulin administration has been well tolerated, with safety and tolerability similar to those with the comparator insulin alone. CONCLUSION: rHuPH20 accelerates insulin-action profiles to an extent comparable to the difference between rapid-acting insulin analogue profiles and those of regular insulin. Studies are currently under way to characterize the effect on diabetes management end points (including hemoglobin A1c, blood glucose, and rates of hyperglycemia) of insulin analogues coformulated with rHuPH20 for treatment of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous ceftriaxone administered with or without recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) versus intravenous ceftriaxone administration in adult volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: To compare pharmacokinetics and safety of recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20)-facilitated subcutaneous (SC) ceftriaxone administration versus SC ceftriaxone preceded by SC saline placebo or intravenous (IV) ceftriaxone administration. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This Phase I, two-part, placebo-controlled, crossover study was conducted in 54 healthy volunteers. In Part 1 (N = 24), subjects received 1 mL rHuPH20 (150 USP units) or placebo (0.9% sodium chloride) SC, followed by 1 or 2 g ceftriaxone (10-350 mg/mL). In Part 2 (N = 30), subjects received 1 g ceftriaxone at the Part 1 maximum tolerated concentration (MTC) administered either SC - preceded by SC rHuPH20 or placebo - or IV. Subjects were monitored for adverse events (AEs); blood samples were obtained (Part 2 only) during 48 hours post-dosing for ceftriaxone bioanalysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Part 1 primary endpoint was the SC ceftriaxone (with or without rHuPH20) MTC. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined in Part 2. Bioequivalence was based on maximum concentration (C(max)) and area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). RESULTS: The highest SC ceftriaxone concentration tested in Part 1 (350 mg/mL) was selected as the Part 2 MTC. In Part 2, median time to maximum concentration (t(max)) was 1 hour earlier (P < 0.0001), and C(max) was 12% higher (P < 0.0001) for ceftriaxone (350 mg/mL) administered via rHuPH20-facilitated SC versus SC preceded by placebo. IV ceftriaxone led to higher C(max) and shorter t(max) values than either SC treatment. Ceftriaxone exposure (AUC) was comparable among all three treatments. At least 1 AE was experienced by 100% of subjects after SC ceftriaxone and 76% after IV; most commonly reported AEs were infusion-site reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftriaxone AUC did not differ significantly between the three administration routes. C(max) was higher and t(max) shorter with rHuPH20-facilitated SC than SC preceded by placebo. rHuPH20-facilitated SC ceftriaxone was generally well tolerated. This study is limited by evaluation of healthy adults and absence of repeated-dose groups.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin: opportunities and outlook.

Immunoglobulin (Ig) administration via the subcutaneous (s.c.) route has become increasingly popular in recent years. The method does not require venous access, is associated with few systemic side effects and has been reported to improve patients' quality of life. One current limitation to its use is the large volumes which need to be administered. Due to the inability of tissue to accept such large volumes, frequent administration at multiple sites is necessary. Most studies conducted to date have investigated the use of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) in patients treated previously with the intravenous (i.v.) formulation. New data now support the use of s.c. administration in previously untreated patients with primary immunodeficiencies. SCIg treatment may further be beneficial in the treatment of autoimmune neurological conditions, such as multi-focal motor neuropathy; however, controlled trials directly comparing the s.c. and i.v. routes are still to be performed for this indication. New developments may further improve and facilitate the s.c. administration route. For example, hyaluronidase-facilitated administration increases the bioavailability of SCIg, and may allow for the administration of larger volumes at a single site. Alternatively, more concentrated formulations may reduce the volume required for administration, and a rapid-push technique may allow for shorter administration times. As these developments translate into clinical practice, more physicians and patients may choose the s.c. administration route in the future.